Three McLaren supercars parked together on a high alpine hairpin road

McLaren vs. Itself: 720S vs. the Hybrid Artura vs. 750S Spider — the Road Test

Three McLarens, one brand arguing with itself. Ron picked the 750S Spider out of loyalty as much as anything, and by the end of the day even he admitted the Artura had done something genuinely surprising.

Back to the mountain that rewards precision

This is the second test in this series to run on the Cime de la Bonette, and the choice is deliberate: a relentless sequence of hairpins with almost no flat sections to recover on is exactly the road to expose the real difference between a hybrid throttle response and a pure-combustion one, rather than letting outright horsepower numbers do all the talking.

Three drivers, three points in McLaren’s own recent history. Juliana takes the McLaren Artura, the brand’s first series-production hybrid, and argues that a genuinely different engineering approach deserves to be judged on its own terms rather than as “the McLaren with a battery.” Ron claims the McLaren 750S Spider — the newest pure-combustion car in the range, and the one he’s already made a case for winning outright at Col de Turini. The McLaren 720S goes to whoever’s narrating: the coupe that came before either of them, and the baseline both newer cars are ultimately measured against.

The numbers, for anyone who wants them before the story

720McLaren 720S hp
700McLaren Artura hp
750McLaren 750S Spider hp
McLaren 720SMcLaren ArturaMcLaren 750S Spider
Seats222
Engine4.0L twin-turbo V83.0L V6 plug-in hybrid4.0L twin-turbo V8
Horsepower720 hp700 hp750 hp
0–100 km/h2.9 sec3.0 sec2.8 sec
Top speed341 km/h330 km/h332 km/h
Rental (per day)~€2,100~€2,100~€2,100
DrivetrainRWDRWDRWD

All three figures come straight from this fleet’s own listing — a genuinely clean, all-McLaren comparison, no hedging required. Worth noting: the Artura has the lowest horsepower figure of the three on paper, which makes what happened on the mountain more interesting, not less.

First stint: the lower hairpins, where the 720S set the baseline

The 720S went up first, and made the case for what a pure twin-turbo V8 without hybrid assistance has always done well: predictable, linear power delivery once boost builds, a chassis that’s been proven across years of real-world driving. “This is still a genuinely excellent car,” the narrator said. “It’s just not the newest idea McLaren has had.”

Ron’s 750S Spider followed, sharper and thirty kilograms lighter than the 720S it replaced, and made the emotional case he’s made before in this series. “This is still the one I’d want,” he said. “It’s everything the 720S is, refined.”

Second stint: the upper hairpins, and the response that changed the verdict

The Artura came up last, into the tightest, most relentless section of the climb, and Juliana’s case stopped being theoretical the moment the hairpins came one after another with no room to recover between them. The hybrid system’s electric motor fills in exactly where a purely combustion engine still has a fraction of lag waiting for boost — and on a road with corner after corner rather than long straights to build speed, that fraction of a second, repeated dozens of times, added up to something both other drivers noticed immediately. “It’s not about the horsepower number,” Juliana said. “It’s that the power is just there, every single time, before either of these two combustion engines have finished thinking about it.” Even Ron, by his own account, hadn’t expected the gap to be this obvious.

A bit of context on each car

The McLaren 720S remains a genuinely excellent pure-combustion supercar, and the baseline this entire test measured everything else against.

The McLaren Artura is McLaren’s first series-production hybrid — see the full apex-hunting test for how it performed against very different rivals on this same road.

The McLaren 750S Spider already won its own test outright — read the Col de Turini road test and the full spotlight for the case Ron makes for it elsewhere.

Practical considerations

The Cime de la Bonette is a seasonal high-alpine road, typically closed by snow outside the warmer months — confirm current conditions before planning a visit. All three cars are confirmed available out of Monaco, the French Riviera, Munich, and Paris.

Our call: the McLaren Artura. Juliana’s pick wins on response, not raw horsepower — the hybrid system’s instant torque-fill genuinely outperformed both pure-combustion McLarens on a road built entirely out of corners. Choose the McLaren 750S Spider if the emotional case and open-top drama matter more than outright responsiveness, or the McLaren 720S if a proven, pure-combustion platform is what you actually want.

All three are standalone rentals out of Monaco, the French Riviera, Munich, and Paris. Get in touch and we’ll set one up.

mclaren 720smclaren arturamclaren 750s spidercime de la bonettecar comparisonron blazerjuliana mc2

Frequently asked questions

Which McLaren won this test?

The Artura, by Juliana's call — the hybrid system's instant torque-fill gave it sharper, more immediate throttle response than either pure-combustion McLaren, even against cars with more outright horsepower.

Isn't a hybrid supposed to be slower to respond than a naturally aspirated or turbo-only car?

Not necessarily — the Artura's electric motor fills in exactly where a purely combustion engine still has lag, which is why it won on responsiveness specifically, not outright power.

Does the 750S Spider still have a case here?

Yes — it remains the emotional pick of the three, and it already won its own test at Col de Turini. This comparison is about outright response and internal brand positioning, not a rejection of the 750S.